Global reset landing by EOD PST time. Enjoy
预告原帖
Tibo@thsottiaux
Day 8/ Reset在 X 查看这条帖子 ↗
· UTC+8
Codex 额度重置与重置卡发放:什么时候生效、给谁、Tibo 原话。
额度重置 · 已预告
Codex 额度重置 · 已预告
按原帖时间,并预留 1–2 小时余量。
原帖时间窗口 · eod · America/Los_Angeles生效情况请以 Tibo 的确认帖和你 Codex 内的用量为准。
Global reset landing by EOD PST time. Enjoy
Day 8/ Reset在 X 查看这条帖子 ↗
We have two additions to PersonalAgentBench: @hark_labs and @OpenAI's Dots! Dots has taken the lead, with Hark close behind while Gemini Spark moves to third, followed by Instinct, Grok Bot, and Muse. We also doubled the number of tasks this week, adding research, image understanding, editing, and everyday communication. The wider set changed the picture. Gemini Spark was strongest on research but weaker on image and editing tasks. Hark and Gemini tied on tasks involving user authority. Dots was the most consistent across task types, although it was weaker when it had to infer personal context. No assistant led every category; the overall ranking rewarded consistent performance across the full set. This is still an early snapshot, and we’re excited to see how results evolve as we add more agents, expand the tasks, and re-evaluate after product updates. If you’re using any of these six personal agents, follow along by visiting the link in the original post.在 X 查看这条帖子 ↗
Which personal agent is the best life assistant? Today we're releasing the micro1 PersonalAgentBench to help answer that, and we're paying real personal agent users to contribute to the benchmark. Personal agents can now book your flights, answer emails, and move your meetings around. That’s great, until one messages the wrong person or makes a purchase without confirming. Capability is not the same as trust. So we put four personal agents to the test: Instinct, Muse, Grok Bot, and Gemini Spark. We found that even when agents found the right information, they still often miss what matters, overshare, or make things up. To find out for yourself how your agent compares, you can join our benchmark. We’re paying the first 100 users to run our prompts and share their results.在 X 查看这条帖子 ↗
按已识别事件统计;同轮预告、进展与确认合并,普通讨论不计入。事件数不等于个人账户实际重置次数。
点日期查看重置、发卡和原帖。
有原话就按原话。“next hour”从原帖发布时间起算;明确钟点按原帖时区换算。PST、PDT 按对应偏移处理,未注明时区时以太平洋当地时间作假设,并明确标注。预估窗口另留 1–2 小时余量。
没写时间就提供参考窗口。参考太平洋时间 16:30–21:30;换算会考虑夏令时。这里只统计确认帖的发布时间,不能据此断言 Tibo 按下重置按钮的时刻。
近 90 天已收录的 8 个确认发布时间中,5 个落在该时段。
来源确认与预估分开展示。明确确认帖才显示“来源已确认”。预估窗口经过 6 小时后可显示“应已生效(预估)”,仍不计入确认记录。发卡不代表额度已恢复,确认帖时间不代表精确到账时间。
持续跟踪公开帖子。新帖每 1.0 小时检查一次,相关旧帖每 6.0 小时复查。消息自动发布,可以人工撤回;个人额度与重置卡余额请在 Codex 内查看。
历史记录起点 ·
覆盖范围仅限已接入、成功读取的公开材料,不保证历史完整;人工录入单独标记。