Back Rohan Paul

Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· 2026-11-05 08:58 · Original publication time AI score60

MIT and University of Queensland research finds gaps in corporate AI risk disclosuresMachine translation

AI introduction

An MIT paper and a University of Queensland study report that 32% of the top 100 companies named no AI risk; the estimated share among the top 1,000 was 62%. None of the top 100 named power concentration or the AI race, and only four named dangerous AI capabilities.

Original post · Original

The article text is unavailable in this language; an existing version is shown.

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

New MIT paper + University of Queensland study

- Most big companies are silent on AI risk. 32% of the top 100 named no AI risk, and an estimated 62% of the top 1000.

The most severe risks are the least mentioned. No top 100 company named power concentration or the AI race, and only 4 named dangerous AI capabilities.

- AI developers skip misalignment. They named it 15% of the time, versus 85% for discrimination (13 listed developers only).

- Silence hides who manages risk. The authors argue companies should name their risks and the safeguard for each.

08:58 · 2026-11-05 · UTC+8

Found an error? Send a correction