aifollow.news
Back Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · Original publication time AI score54

Paper questions safety assessments of recursive self-improvementMachine translation

AI introduction

The paper argues that recursive self-improvement cannot yet be called safe because there is no clear way to reason about where it leads. The author's two-player game suggests the race is a Prisoner's Dilemma only at some risk levels; at high risk, both sides holding back can be a stable outcome.

Original post · Original

The article text is unavailable in this language; an existing version is shown.

@rohanpaul_ai

– https://t.co/fG6X0jD22z

Title: "Is Recursive Self-Improvement Safe?"

ReplyRohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
This paper argues that no one can call recursive self-improvement safe yet, because we lack even a clear way to think about where it leads. Recursive self-improvement, or RSI, means an AI builds a better AI, which builds a better one, and so on. AI companies are starting to pursue it, with no shared view of when it would be safe. As an ordinary user, the author got an AI to train a small LLM from scratch from 1 high-level prompt. At a https://t.co/I8EjyOkuK6 safety workshop, experts listed very different conditions for RSI because they imagined very different outcomes. His 2-player game shows the RSI race is a Prisoner's Dilemma only at some risk levels. At high risk, both sides holding back is a stable outcome, so waiting together can work.
View this post on X ↗

Source: Rohan Paul · x.com

Research
Found an error? Send a correction