aifollow.news
返回 Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · 原发布时间 AI 评分54

斯坦福研究提出 AI 任务能效指标,较小模型在测试中每焦耳创造更多价值

AI 导读

研究人员提出 Joules-to-GDP,以 AI 完成任务的经济价值扣除运行成本后,再按能耗衡量回报。他们在覆盖 44 种职业的 220 项任务上测试了 5 个开放模型:Gemma 4 31B 以 GLM 5.2 的 23% 能耗取得其 56% 的净价值,折合每焦耳价值为后者的 2.5 倍。团队还与 SnorkelAI 发布了覆盖另外 36 种职业的 GDPWorks 基准。

原帖引用 · 原文

@rohanpaul_ai

New Stanford paper finds that a smaller AI model can return far more economic value per unit of energy than the most capable one.

Now that the world is limited by energy/power, how much energy each AI task burns should indeed by studied.

Here, the researchers built Joules-to-GDP, which measures the dollar value of an AI's work, minus its running cost, per joule of energy used. They tested 5 open models on 220 professional tasks from GDPval, covering 44 occupations.

> GLM 5.2 produced the most net value per task, but Gemma 4 31B got 56% of it with 23% of the energy.

> Moving Qwen3.6-27B from 1 to 8 H100s cut task time by just 22% while using 3.2x the energy.

> GPT-OSS 120B used 68% less energy than GLM 5.2 despite nearly the same price and speed.

> Running the same model on 8 H100 chips instead of 1 made tasks only 22% faster but used 3.24x the energy, for nearly the same dollar value of work

https://t.co/KAj3vxhHto

引用Jon Saad-Falcon@JonSaadFalcon
AI is using more and more of the world’s energy. But how much economic value are we getting from AI? We’re introducing Joules-to-GDP (J2G), a framework that measures how well AI turns energy into economic value and shows which tasks, models, and hardware give the best return. Across 44 occupations in finance, engineering, law, administrative work, and more in @OpenAI's GDPval, we arrive at three findings: 1) The tasks with the highest economic value are not the tasks with the highest economic value per joule. For example, CAD design earns ~10% more per task than building websites, but the latter earns ~27% more value per joule. 2) The most powerful model isn’t always the best use of energy. Gemma 4 31B delivers 56% of GLM 5.2’s net value with 23% of the energy, for 2.5x the value per joule. 3) More chips don’t guarantee proportionate returns. Moving the same model from 1 to 8 NVIDIA H100s uses 3.2x the energy but cuts completion time by only 22%, with about the same value. With @SnorkelAI, we’re also releasing GDPWorks, a benchmark for economically valuable tasks across 36 additional occupations. Joint work co-led by @amirzeinaalii and @Avanika15, with @Mersad_Abbasi, @Jon_Hartley_, John Hennessy, @HazyResearch, and @Azaliamirh. More details below 🧵
在 X 查看这条帖子 ↗

来源:Rohan Paul · x.com

论文
发现内容有误?提交纠错