aifollow.news
Back Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · Original publication time AI score54

Study finds few examples can match 15 for small open models on natural language inferenceMachine translation

AI introduction

A study tested five small open models on three natural language inference datasets, where the task is to decide whether one sentence follows from another, contradicts it, or is unrelated. Gemma 2, Llama 3.1, and Mistral scored about the same with one or 15 examples on MNLI and SciTail; Mistral 7B also exceeded the 63.4% MNLI accuracy reported for a published method using the same model.

Original post · Original

@rohanpaul_ai

– https://t.co/pumIZMrDYl

Title: "How Many Examples, and Which Ones? A Study of In-Context Learning for Natural Language Inference"

ReplyRohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
This paper finds that a short, direct prompt with a few examples (In-Context Learning) lets small open LLMs match more complex prompting methods on natural language inference. The task, called NLI, asks whether one sentence follows from another, contradicts it, or is unrelated. Earlier LLM work on it leaned on complex prompting and sampling tricks, assuming more examples help. They tested 5 small open models, including Gemma 2 9B, Mistral 7B and Llama 3.1 8B, on 3 NLI datasets. Each got 1 short, direct prompt with 0 to 15 examples and no reasoning steps. Mistral 7B beat the 63.4% MNLI accuracy that a published in-context sampling method got with the same model. Gemma 2, Llama 3.1 and Mistral scored about the same with 1 example or 15 on MNLI and SciTail.
View this post on X ↗

Source: Rohan Paul · x.com

Research
Found an error? Send a correction