原帖引用 · AI 翻译
标题：“工作是为了什么？人工智能时代的劳动、政治与意义”
牛津大学和 Google DeepMind 的一篇新论文发现，大多数劳动者看重工作的原因不只是薪酬，因此仅靠基本收入可能无法弥补人工智能造成的失业。
因此，针对人工智能转型的规划除了保障收入，还应保护工作中的目标感、社群归属感和尊严。
研究发现，如果能保证获得相当于原工资 100% 的收入，约 75% 的劳动者会辞职，但每 5 人中有 1 人即使获得 120% 的收入也不愿辞职。
如果人工智能使许多工作实现自动化，一种常见的方案是用基本收入替代失去的工资。只有在人们工作主要是为了挣钱的情况下，这种方案才行得通。
作者调查了英国、美国、丹麦和印度的 8,234 名劳动年龄成年人。研究人员根据劳动者在工作中最看重的方面对其分类，并询问他们：多少有保障的收入会让他们辞职。
在被分类的劳动者中，只有 26% 主要看重工作的薪酬，而 1/3 看重工作本身。即使获得相当于工资 120% 的有保障收入，仍有 20% 的人会继续工作；这一比例在不同收入水平的人群中相近。
原文
New Oxford and Google DeepMind paper finds most workers value jobs beyond pay, so basic income alone may not offset AI job losses. So plans for the AI transition should protect purpose, community, and dignity at work as well as income. finds that about 75% of workers would quit if guaranteed 100% of their wage, yet 1 in 5 would refuse even 120%. If AI automates many jobs, a common plan is a basic income that replaces lost wages. That plan works only if people work mainly for the money. The author surveyed 8,234 working-age adults in the UK, US, Denmark, and India. Workers were sorted by what they value most in their job and asked what guaranteed income would make them quit. Only 26% of classified workers valued their job mainly for pay, while one third valued the work itself. 20% would keep working even if offered 120% of their salary as guaranteed income, a share similar across income levels.