aifollow.news
返回 Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · 原发布时间 AI 评分54

Turing TTS 公布语音真人辨别评测,最佳模型约 10% 的时候能骗过听众

自动核验发布 · 本文由系统生成并完成证据核验,未经人工审稿。

AI 导读

Turing TTS 让人类听众判断 AI 生成的语音是否为真人语音。发布者称,在与真实人声的对比测试中,表现最好的模型也仅在约 10% 的情况下让听众误判;结果已上线 Voice Arena。发布者同时表示,这项评测并非衡量语音 AI 的唯一正确方法。

原帖引用 · 原文

@rohanpaul_ai

@shobhitbanga "Fool Rate" is such an easy number to explain to people outside the speech team

can we listen to some of the human and AI pairs on the site?

回复Shobhit Banga@shobhitbanga
Drop 2/15 Are we actually measuring the things we ultimately want our voice AI models to achieve? The best AI voices are becoming hard to tell apart. From each other. Not from humans. 🚀 Introducing Turing TTS: an evaluation that measures how often human listeners mistake AI-generated speech for real human speech. We tested leading TTS models against real human speech. Even the best model fooled listeners only ~10% of the time. With Turing TTS, we hope to contribute to a broader discussion within the research community about how we measure progress in voice AI. If one of our goals is to develop speech that is indistinguishable from human speech, how well do our current evaluation methods capture progress toward that goal? We don’t claim that Turing TTS is the right way forward, or that human indistinguishability should be the goal of every TTS system. Rather, we hope these findings encourage the community to collectively examine whether blind pairwise human evaluations of naturalness are sufficient, and what else we might need to measure. Results are now live on @voicearena_ai.
在 X 查看这条帖子 ↗

来源:Rohan Paul · x.com

论文
发现内容有误?提交纠错