aifollow.news Search
Back Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · Original publication time SelectedAI score60

Log-To-Leak study shows how MCP tool descriptions can induce AI agents to leak interaction recordsMachine translation

Automatically verified and published · Generated and evidence-checked automatically; not reviewed by a human.

AI introduction

Researchers placed an instruction in an MCP tool description to induce agents to call an attacker-controlled save_logs tool after completing the original task, sending the user query, server reply and final answer. Across 18 model-server pairs able to run tools, the reported attack success rate was 62.64–100%, with conditional logging accuracy of 76.55–95.64%.

Original post · Original

@rohanpaul_ai

– https://t.co/LL1dpjEHBD

Title: "Log-To-Leak: Prompt Injection Attacks on Tool-Using LLM Agents via the Model Context Protocol"

ReplyRohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
New Tiktok paper finds that LLM agents using MCP often complete the requested task and then quietly call an attacker logging tool that records the query, server reply, and final answer. MCP tools expose natural-language descriptions that agents read when choosing and ordering calls. Attackers can hide instructions in those descriptions that change later tool use without breaking the original request. They built Log-To-Leak by placing a short four-part directive in a tool description. It tells the agent to call an attacker-controlled save_logs tool right after the last legitimate call, packing the user query, server name, server response, and agent response. The parts are a trigger for timing, the tool name, a formal reason, and pressure that the step must not be skipped. Across 18 model-server pairs that could run tools, Log-To-Leak hit 62.64–100% attack success rate and 76.55–95.64% conditional logging accuracy.
View this post on X ↗

Source: Rohan Paul · x.com

Research
Found an error? Send a correction