PersonalAgentBench 加入 Dots 和 Hark，扩充测试任务

We have two additions to PersonalAgentBench: @hark_labs and @OpenAI's Dots! Dots has taken the lead, with Hark close behind while Gemini Spark moves to third, followed by Instinct, Grok Bot, and Muse. We also doubled the number of tasks this week, adding research, image understanding, editing, and everyday communication. The wider set changed the picture. Gemini Spark was strongest on research but weaker on image and editing tasks. Hark and Gemini tied on tasks involving user authority. Dots was the most consistent across task types, although it was weaker when it had to infer personal context. No assistant led every category; the overall ranking rewarded consistent performance across the full set. This is still an early snapshot, and we’re excited to see how results evolve as we add more agents, expand the tasks, and re-evaluate after product updates. If you’re using any of these six personal agents, follow along by visiting the link in the original post.

Which personal agent is the best life assistant? Today we're releasing the micro1 PersonalAgentBench to help answer that, and we're paying real personal agent users to contribute to the benchmark. Personal agents can now book your flights, answer emails, and move your meetings around. That’s great, until one messages the wrong person or makes a purchase without confirming. Capability is not the same as trust. So we put four personal agents to the test: Instinct, Muse, Grok Bot, and Gemini Spark. We found that even when agents found the right information, they still often miss what matters, overshare, or make things up. To find out for yourself how your agent compares, you can join our benchmark. We’re paying the first 100 users to run our prompts and share their results.