aifollow.news
Back Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · Original publication time AI score54

Google Research tests challenging AI teammates for entrepreneurial skills practiceMachine translation

AI introduction

Google Research extended its Vantage learning platform with AI teammates that pitch flawed ideas, disagree and make false claims during business tasks, without doing the work for students. In a trial of 52 students, the Vantage group averaged 67.6% on the final business plan, versus 60.5% for a control group using standard AI tools; these figures come from the supplied post’s description of the paper.

Original post · AI translation

@rohanpaul_ai
Translation · refer to the original

– arxiv. org/abs/2611.02016

标题:“通过与 AI 练习提升创业技能”

ReplyRohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
Translation
Google 的一篇新论文发现,与会提出异议的 AI 队友一起练习的学生,写出的商业计划书比使用普通 AI 工具的学生更好。 批判性思维和协作等技能对创业很重要,但这些技能难以教授,也难以让学生大规模地练习。 他们扩展了 Google Research 的 Vantage 平台。在该平台上,学生通过聊天与由 Gemini 3.1 Pro 驱动的 AI 队友一起完成商业任务。这些队友会提出有缺陷的想法、表达不同意见和作出错误断言,但绝不会替学生完成任务。 在一项有 52 名学生参加的试验中,Vantage 组最终商业计划书的平均得分为 67.6%,而使用标准 AI 工具的对照组为 60.5%。完成 5 至 6 项练习任务的学生平均得分为 79.7%,没有完成任何练习任务的学生得分为 59.3%。 如果你为学习开发 AI,就让它成为会向人们提出挑战的队友,而不是替他们完成工作的助手。
Original

New Google paper finds that students who practiced with AI teammates that push back wrote better business plans than students using normal AI tools. Skills like critical thinking and collaboration matter for starting a business, but they are hard to teach and hard to practice at scale. They extended Vantage, a Google Research platform where students solve business tasks in chat with AI teammates run by Gemini 3.1 Pro. The teammates pitch flawed ideas, disagree, and state false claims, but never do the task for the student. In a trial with 52 students, the Vantage group averaged 67.6% on the final business plan, versus 60.5% for controls using standard AI tools. Students who did 5 to 6 practice tasks averaged 79.7%, while those who did none scored 59.3%. If you build AI for learning, make it a teammate that challenges people, not an assistant that finishes their work.

View this post on X ↗

Source: Rohan Paul · x.com

Research
Found an error? Send a correction