aifollow.news
Back Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · Original publication time AI score19

Bill Gates says tax rules could accelerate AI-driven labor replacementMachine translation

AI introduction

Speaking at FT Live, Bill Gates argued that tax rules place a heavier burden on hiring workers while favoring capital spending on robots or AI tokens, accelerating efforts to replace employees. He also said leading labs have stronger models they have yet to release and predicted new versions before year-end and next year.

Original post · Original

The article text is unavailable in this language; an existing version is shown.

@rohanpaul_ai

https://t.co/1AI0R0YSQM

ReplyRohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
Bill Gates confirmed that the top labs already have stronger models sitting unreleased. "So we crossed a very amazing threshold and since then the models have just gotten better. In fact, you know, they have new versions that they haven't released that'll probably come out before the end of the year, and then 2 major releases next year." --- Full video on Full video on "FT Live" YT channel, link in comment
View this post on X ↗
QuoteRohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
Full video on Full video on "FT Live" YT channel https://t.co/vLIoASZgJP
View this post on X ↗
Related contextRohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
Bill Gates, live on FT. Tax rules charge companies more to hire a person than to buy AI, so they push businesses to replace people faster with robots or AI tokens. "The AI, once it's properly set up, and as we get these much, much better versions, it is very cheap to replace the white collar labor. And its not just law, or business consulting, it's every area of the economy. And so the taxation policies that we have, and the fact that we make labor is where you put the tax burden, and we're really generous on the capital spending to say buy the robots or buy the tokens, that is going to accelerate these replacement efforts. " --- Full video on Full video on "FT Live" YT channel, link in comment
View this post on X ↗

Source: Rohan Paul · x.com

Opinion
Found an error? Send a correction