原帖引用 · 原文
该语言的正文暂不可用，当前显示已有版本。
New Princeton Univ + Google paper finds that the decision model most accurate on isolated questions solved only 69.5% of agent tasks, while a 4B model trained on agent states solved 91.5%.
Agent harnesses call a big LLM at every step, which makes long tasks slow and costly. Yet most of those calls just pick from a list, like which tool to use next.
Their harness asks a fast decision model each multiple-choice question and uses its answer only above a confidence threshold fitted on the agent's own runs. They also trained AgentDecision-4B on states the agent actually reaches, including after its own mistakes.
On tasks like their training data, 4B models trained this way made agents 81.1% to 89.0% cheaper and up to 2.5x faster. Success stayed within 3 points, while handing over every tool choice with no threshold lowered success by 19.0 points.
To hand routine agent choices to a small model, train it and set its confidence threshold on your agent's own runs.
– arxiv. org/abs/2610.21412
Title: "JevAgentHarness: Benchmarking, Deploying and Training Decision Models That Share Control with LLMs"