aifollow.news
返回 Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · 原发布时间 AI 评分40

Robbyant 发布开源机器人触觉模型 LingBot-Touch

AI 导读

LingBot-Touch 将指尖传感器读数转成机器人控制软件可用的信号,采用 Apache 2.0 许可。引用材料称,在相同触觉数据和模型规模下,其 JEPA 版本使用 4,000 小时数据训练后,在触觉检索视频任务中取得 49.3% 的 top-5 准确率;这些数字来自发布相关材料,尚不能视为独立验证。

原帖引用 · 原文

@rohanpaul_ai

the official links for LingBot-Touch

Project Page: https://t.co/VnqPXymSfT

Technical Report: https://t.co/Aioy9BtFDZ

Paper - https://t.co/xBMKx3qzth

GitHub: https://t.co/3TfvXgIzPd

Hugging Face: https://t.co/rpEBIQ5Udk

回复Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
Looks like a brilliant open source release for robotics. A great problem of robotics is that a camera can’t tell a robot how hard it’s squeezing or whether a grip is slipping, but a fingertip sensor can. Robbyant released LingBot-Touch, an open-source model (Apache 2.0) that gives robots a sense of touch by turning fingertip sensor readings into signals their control software can use. Robbyant trained three same-size encoders (5.46M parameters each) on the same touch data for LingBot-Touch. At 4,000 hours, the JEPA version, which predicts the masked parts in latent space, got 49.3% top-5 on tactile→video retrieval. MAE stayed under 9%. The VAE got 3.1%, worse than it did at 1,000 hours. I think the reason is the data itself. A finger only presses a few spots, so most of every frame is close to zero, and the readings that aren't zero are noisy. Redrawing that means copying zeros and noise nobody can predict, and a JEPA only predicts the representation, so it can leave both out. The paper names the sparsity and the low signal-to-noise ratio as the reasons they went with JEPA. The sparsity shaped training too. With 80% of taxels masked from step one, a lot of clips had no contact left to see and the gradients blew up, so they ramp the mask from 40% to 80% over the first 300 steps. Targets come from an EMA encoder at four depths, following V-JEPA 2.1. To isolate the effect of multi-source data, they hold each sensor's own data fixed and add only the other modalities. With the target sensor's data unchanged, the multi-source model improves on seven of the eight sensor-task pairs, indicating that data from heterogeneous sensors directly benefits each individual sensor.
在 X 查看这条帖子 ↗

来源:Rohan Paul · x.com

模型
发现内容有误?提交纠错