aifollow.news
Back Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · Original publication time AI score40

Robbyant releases open-source robot touch model LingBot-TouchMachine translation

AI introduction

LingBot-Touch turns fingertip sensor readings into signals robot control software can use and is licensed under Apache 2.0. The cited account says its JEPA version reached 49.3% top-5 accuracy on tactile-to-video retrieval after training on 4,000 hours of data, with model size and touch data held the same across the compared encoders. The reported result is not an independent verification.

Original post · Original

The article text is unavailable in this language; an existing version is shown.

@rohanpaul_ai

the official links for LingBot-Touch

Project Page: https://t.co/VnqPXymSfT

Technical Report: https://t.co/Aioy9BtFDZ

Paper - https://t.co/xBMKx3qzth

GitHub: https://t.co/3TfvXgIzPd

Hugging Face: https://t.co/rpEBIQ5Udk

ReplyRohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
Looks like a brilliant open source release for robotics. A great problem of robotics is that a camera can’t tell a robot how hard it’s squeezing or whether a grip is slipping, but a fingertip sensor can. Robbyant released LingBot-Touch, an open-source model (Apache 2.0) that gives robots a sense of touch by turning fingertip sensor readings into signals their control software can use. Robbyant trained three same-size encoders (5.46M parameters each) on the same touch data for LingBot-Touch. At 4,000 hours, the JEPA version, which predicts the masked parts in latent space, got 49.3% top-5 on tactile→video retrieval. MAE stayed under 9%. The VAE got 3.1%, worse than it did at 1,000 hours. I think the reason is the data itself. A finger only presses a few spots, so most of every frame is close to zero, and the readings that aren't zero are noisy. Redrawing that means copying zeros and noise nobody can predict, and a JEPA only predicts the representation, so it can leave both out. The paper names the sparsity and the low signal-to-noise ratio as the reasons they went with JEPA. The sparsity shaped training too. With 80% of taxels masked from step one, a lot of clips had no contact left to see and the gradients blew up, so they ramp the mask from 40% to 80% over the first 300 steps. Targets come from an EMA encoder at four depths, following V-JEPA 2.1. To isolate the effect of multi-source data, they hold each sensor's own data fixed and add only the other modalities. With the target sensor's data unchanged, the multi-source model improves on seven of the eight sensor-task pairs, indicating that data from heterogeneous sensors directly benefits each individual sensor.
View this post on X ↗

Source: Rohan Paul · x.com

Model
Found an error? Send a correction