aifollow.news
Back TechCrunch AI 报道
TechCrunch AI 报道· · Original publication time AI score33

Judge denies xAI’s motion to dismiss NAACP lawsuit over data center pollutionMachine translation

法官驳回 xAI 撤诉请求,NAACP 数据中心污染诉讼将继续

Automatically verified and published · Generated and evidence-checked automatically; not reviewed by a human.

AI-assisted summary

A federal judge denied xAI’s motion to dismiss an NAACP lawsuit alleging that xAI operated gas turbines at its Colossus data center outside Memphis without the required permits. The judge found that the turbines were not “mobile sources” under the applicable state plan and that the plaintiffs had standing under the Clean Air Act. The lawsuit will proceed; the pollution and permit allegations have not been resolved.

Article · Original

A federal judge denied a motion by xAI seeking to dismiss an NAACP lawsuit accusing the SpaceX-owned company of failing to obtain permits needed to operate the gas turbines powering its Colossus data center outside Memphis.

Suing on behalf of the NAACP, the Southern Environmental Law Center said the AI company had “installed and operated at least 35 combustion turbines and other sources of air pollution at the Colossus site without ever obtaining the necessary preconstruction or operating air permits.” It also accused xAI of violating the Clean Air Act.

xAI sought to have the lawsuit dismissed, claiming that the turbines are exempt from permitting requirements because they’re mobile. The company also argued that the plaintiffs did not have the standing to sue.

“Because the plaintiffs have statutory standing under the Clean Air Act, because the combustion turbines are not ‘mobile sources’ under Mississippi’s [State Implementation Plan], and because the citizen suit provision does not violate Article II of the Constitution or the private nondelegation doctrine, the plaintiffs’ claims will proceed,” Judge Debra M. Brown wrote in her decision .

Focusing on xAI’s claim that these kinds of citizen lawsuits are unconstitutional, Judge Brown wrote, “Because citizen suit plaintiffs sue on their own behalf, in their own name, and seek penalties that redress harm to themselves, they are not exercising the federal government’s executive power.”

TechCrunch has reached out to SpaceX for comment.

In a statement , the NAACP’s director of environmental and climate justice Abre’ Connor described this as “another important victory in our effort to hold xAI accountable.” (A similar motion to dismiss from the Department of Justice was denied earlier this month )

“The courts have repeatedly rejected attempts by xAI and the DOJ to dismiss the NAACP’s Clean Air Act case, affirming our right to pursue justice for communities impacted by pollution,” Connor said. “Our position has been clear: xAI cannot operate gas turbines without the required permits.”

The NAACP lawsuit is moving forward as public opinion seems to have turned sharply against data centers, with New York recently passing a moratorium on new data centers and other state and local governments considering similar measures.

The backlash also prompted Amazon and Microsoft to promise to stop using NDAs in their dealings with government agencies, and it could be a significant factor in the imminent U.S. midterm elections .

Found an error? Send a correction