aifollow.news
返回 Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · 原发布时间 AI 评分54

伯克利等机构研究发现:智能体改写自身配置后,平均得分可能掩盖任务退步

AI 导读

一篇由加州大学伯克利分校等机构参与的论文,检验了模型不变、仅让智能体修改提示词、技能、工具或代码的做法。研究用 GPT-5.4 测试四种演化方法:16 个演化后的智能体都新增了能完成的任务,也失去了原本能完成的任务;在可靠性提高的 11 个智能体中,8 个的单次运行成本也上升。

原帖引用 · 原文

@rohanpaul_ai

– https://t.co/3GPv1FtvHo

Title: "Beneath the Surface: What We Overlook When We Talk About Agent Evolution"

回复Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
New University of California, Berkeley+other top labs paper finds that agents that rewrite their own harness to score higher also lose tasks they once solved, which the average score hides. Harness evolution lets an agent edit its own prompts, skills, tools, or code while the model stays frozen. Results usually come as 1 higher benchmark score, which can hide lost tasks, higher costs, and gains that don't carry over. They ran 4 evolution methods, including GEPA and HyperAgents, with GPT-5.4 on 2 harnesses and 2 benchmarks. Then they re-tested each evolved agent 8 times against its starting version. All 16 evolved agents gained some tasks and lost others, and 1 raised reliability by 5.2 points while losing 10 tasks it used to cover. Of 11 agents that became more reliable, 8 also cost more per run. When you evolve an agent harness, track tasks lost, cost per run, and results on unseen tasks, not just the average score.
在 X 查看这条帖子 ↗

来源:Rohan Paul · x.com

论文
发现内容有误?提交纠错