aifollow.news Search
Back Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · Original publication time AI score46

Elvis Presley music rights holders sue Anthropic over alleged Claude training and lyric reproductionsMachine translation

Automatically verified and published · Generated and evidence-checked automatically; not reviewed by a human.

AI introduction

Authentic Brands Group and publishers that co-own the catalog filed a federal suit alleging Claude was trained on 274 songs and reproduced song material in its answers. They seek about $41 million. Anthropic had not responded when the suit was first reported, and no court had tested the allegations.

Original post · Original

The article text is unavailable in this language; an existing version is shown.

@rohanpaul_ai

Elvis Presley’s music owners sued Anthropic for about $41M, alleging Claude was trained on 274 songs.

Authentic Brands Group filed the federal case, ABE EPE LLC v. Anthropic, alongside several publishers that co-own the catalog.

Its demand multiplies those 274 works by $150K, the maximum statutory damages US copyright law allows per work for willful infringement.

It targets both training and outputs, alleging Claude reproduced material from nearly every song catalog online, even after Anthropic added guardrails following earlier publisher suits.

As evidence, it quotes Claude admitting that its rewrites of specific songs “for a modern audience” reused the originals’ structure and hooks with light rewording.

Anthropic had not responded when the suit was first reported, and no court has tested any of these claims.

In 2025, a federal judge ruled that training Claude on lawfully purchased books was fair use, a precedent Anthropic will likely cite against the training claims.

Near-copies of lyrics in Claude’s answers sit outside that ruling, so the case may hinge on how reliably Anthropic’s guardrails block them.

Source: Rohan Paul · x.com

Industry
Found an error? Send a correction