Article · Original
The article text is unavailable in this language; an existing version is shown.
@deepcabinwala @ContextQa Congrats again on the launch. brilliant idea in this product.
Automatically verified and published · Generated and evidence-checked automatically; not reviewed by a human.
Ship is described as reading code changes, identifying affected user flows and testing them in a deployed app. It can also reproduce bugs reported in Slack or Linear, find likely causes and pass evidence to a developer or coding agent.
The article text is unavailable in this language; an existing version is shown.
@deepcabinwala @ContextQa Congrats again on the launch. brilliant idea in this product.
@rohanpaul_ai @ContextQa Thanks for the thoughtful write-up, Rohan 🙌 Checking the customer journey deserves as much attention as shipping the change.
View replied-to post on X
Generating a PR with an agent is cheap now. Checking that it didn't break a user flow still takes a person and a browser.
That second job is where a lot of engineering time goes now.
@ContextQa released Ship, an AI agent that works as an automated QA engineer:
> It reads the PR
> works out which user flows the change affects, and runs those flows against the deployed app.
> reproduces bugs reported in Slack or Linear, finds the likely cause, and hands the evidence to a developer or a coding agent like Claude or Codex to fix.
If agents are going to ship more code, something other than a human has to exercise the result.
View context on X