aifollow.news Search
Back Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · Original publication time SelectedAI score68

SenseNova releases embodied intelligence study and RoboRSI-27B-Preview modelMachine translation

Automatically verified and published · Generated and evidence-checked automatically; not reviewed by a human.

AI introduction

The SenseNova team studied GPT-6-Astra across 12 simulation benchmarks and eight real-robot platforms, and released an open-source RoboRSI framework and a 27B model. The team says GPT-6-Astra led all 12 benchmarks when given demonstrations and up to 10 times the interaction budget. It also reports about $55 in inference costs for a simple task and delays that pose problems for real robots.

Why it matters

研究同时给出机器人任务的测试成绩、测试条件和实际成本,让关注 AI 能力进展的读者看到实验表现与现实使用之间的差距。

Original post · Original

The article text is unavailable in this language; an existing version is shown.

@rohanpaul_ai

Read more on this paper that SenseNova published along with other some of the top labs.

https://t.co/EJQFdY4jou https://t.co/n9qADboUIV

ReplyRohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
The key idea behind SenseNova-RoboRSI is experience internalization. GPT-6-Astra uses ICL to extract useful information from demonstrations, including visual examples, robot states, action trajectories, tools, and recovery strategies. SenseTime distills this embodied experience into the open-source RoboRSI-27B-Preview, which demonstrates active perception, spatial reasoning, planning, and feedback-driven revision at roughly 1/50 the task cost.
View this post on X ↗
Related contextSenseTime@SenseTime_AI
We release the most comprehensive 𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗱𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝗣𝗧-𝟲-𝗔𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮’𝘀 𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 across 12 simulation benchmarks and 8 real-robot platforms, together with 𝗦𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗡𝗼𝘃𝗮-𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗼𝗥𝗦𝗜: an open-source harness framework and a 27B model that runs at ~1/50 the cost of GPT-6-Astra. Here's what we found: 🔹 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗰𝗲𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗺𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝗵𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗲𝗿. Under a unified protocol (ICL + up to 10× the interaction budget), GPT-6-Astra achieves clear SOTA across all 12 benchmarks: RoboDojo: 27.6% at 1× → 81.9% at 10×, DexJoCo: 87.3% vs. 40.3% prior SOTA, while the LIBERO benchmarks are pushed to saturation. 🔹 𝗧𝗼𝗼 𝗺𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝗯𝘂𝗰𝗸 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗴. Even a simple task like placing pens in a holder costs ~$55 in inference. 🔹 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝗶𝘁. Time matters as real robots overheat, and an egg burned while the model was still thinking. Our takeaway: GPT-6-Astra has largely crossed the threshold of 𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲, but 𝗽𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 is not here yet. 🌐 Project page: https://t.co/m0ntdtBamB 📄 Report: https://t.co/ySEnd7oIj9 💻 Code & model: https://t.co/iTVQ1YD7mP
View this post on X ↗

来源:Rohan Paul · x.com

Research
Found an error? Send a correction