aifollow.news
Back Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · Original publication time AI score54

Living Brain introduces shared memory for multiple AI toolsMachine translation

AI introduction

Living Brain says its separate memory store can be read and written by ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, Codex and custom agents. Agents connect through MCP or an API, allowing accumulated context to persist when models or agent frameworks change. The service selects memories relevant to each question; the company claims this uses up to 22.6 times fewer tokens per question.

Original post · Original

The article text is unavailable in this language; an existing version is shown.

@rohanpaul_ai

Memory is becoming its own layer in the AI stack, separate from whichever model does the reasoning.

@livingbrain treats AI models as swappable engines and your accumulated context as the part that stays. Agents plug in through MCP or an API, so changing the model or agent framework leaves the memory intact.

Up to 95% lower cost per task. 3.7s median end-to-end answer.

Instead of sending the model your entire history every time, Living Brain picks only the few stored memories relevant to the current question and sends those, so the model processes far fewer tokens (up to 22.6x fewer), which is what cuts the cost per task by up to 95%.

ChatGPT and Claude each keep their own private memory of you, and neither can read the other’s. Living Brain moves that memory into a separate store that both tools, plus your own agents, can read and write.

QuoteChristel Buchanan@ladyxtel
We decoupled memory from the model. Living Brain is one persistent brain for ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, Codex and your own agents. Write in one, retrieve in any. 92.2% on LoCoMo. 464ms median retrieval. Up to 22.6x fewer tokens per question. LLMs have parameters. Living Brain has plasticity.
View this post on X ↗

Source: Rohan Paul · x.com

Products
Found an error? Send a correction