Original post · Original
The article text is unavailable in this language; an existing version is shown.
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
Every time Claude answers, it now quietly asks itself whether it just helped someone cause harm, and that private verdict goes to Anthropic’s reviewers.
Anthropic’s most accurate misuse detector is a Claude Mythos Preview classifier that reads all its safety policies before every ruling, which makes it too expensive to run on every chat.
So Anthropic trained Claude to copy its judgments without the policies or the reasoning, and on Fable 5 traffic the copy matches 78% of the detector’s flags, rising to 94% for high-priority cases, at a 1% false-alarm rate.
View this post on X ↗
We’ve trained Claude to flag potential misuse in conversations, a technique we call self-assessment. Right after it responds, Claude gives a preliminary safety assessment of the conversation.
Since we began using self-assessment in June, it has surfaced misuse that our other safeguards weren’t designed to catch.
Because Claude has already read the conversation, self-assessment is very efficient. And unlike classifiers, which target a discrete set of harms, it draws on Claude’s own judgment, so it gets more accurate as our models improve.
Read more on our new Safeguards blog:
https://t.co/18j6zdHub4
View this post on X ↗
· UTC+8