aifollow.news Search
Back Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · Original publication time AI score54

Google DeepMind paper examines forgetting in self-improving agentsMachine translation

Automatically verified and published · Generated and evidence-checked automatically; not reviewed by a human.

AI introduction

The paper compares ReasoningBank, GEPA and Meta-Harness on task streams that change topic, workflow or domain. The account says GEPA gained an average of 6.2 points per block while losing 4.3 points on other tasks; a rule that had delivered a 15.5-point gain retained only a 2.5-point gain after a later update.

Original post · Original

The article text is unavailable in this language; an existing version is shown.

@rohanpaul_ai

– https://t.co/bKiv4AL9YL

Title: "Are Self-Evolving Agents Continual Learners?"

ReplyRohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
New Google DeepMind paper finds that self-improving agents forget as they learn, and the method that learned new tasks fastest broke old ones the most. Self-evolving agents improve without retraining by editing their system prompt, memory, or skill files. In real use tasks keep shifting, and each edit made for 1 task also applies to every task that follows. The team ran ReasoningBank, GEPA, and Meta-Harness on task streams that changed topic, workflow, or domain. They tracked how much each method learned on the current task and lost on the others. GEPA learned the most, 6.2 points per block on average, and also lost the most elsewhere, 4.3 points. After it learned to ask users for missing details, a later block rewrote that rule and its 15.5-point gain fell to 2.5. If your agent edits its own prompt or memory, keep task-specific rules separate and retest old tasks after every update.
View this post on X ↗

来源:Rohan Paul · x.com

Research
Found an error? Send a correction