aifollow.news
返回 Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X· · 原发布时间 AI 评分47

@millionwaysai 发布 Thorsten-4,分析对话中的行为倾向

AI 导读

一则引用帖称,Thorsten-4 可分析会议、邮件和客服通话等对话,并按 50 项行为与心理特征评估说话者。帖文称,其训练资料来自对 7,000 多人持续四年的访谈,预测结果曾与心理测试及受访者后续行为比对;相关效果仍是帖文的主张。

原帖引用 · 原文

该语言的正文暂不可用,当前显示已有版本。

@rohanpaul_ai

https://t.co/AY48f41kO2

回复Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
This AI reads the motives behind what executives say on earnings calls. A hedge fund now trades a dedicated $50M portfolio on it. Thorsten-4, a Large Psychology Model that can read what somebody is really trying to say. Psychologists interviewed the same 7,000+ people again and again over 4 years and hand-tagged 35M+ words from those talks against 50 behavioral and psychological traits. so the model learned which language patterns (how someone frames a decision, handles uncertainty or reacts under pressure) match which motives and decision styles. Because they followed the same people for years, they could keep only the patterns that held steady across situations, then test the model’s predictions against established psychology tests and against what those people actually did later.
在 X 查看这条帖子 ↗
相关上下文Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
Brilliant release and this is such a different kind of AI. @millionwaysai launched Thorsten-4 today, AI that reads people’s motives Every AI company trains on the same internet, and the internet doesn’t record why people do what they do. So the AI agents now running sales calls, job interviews and customer service keep misreading people, and each misread costs a dea. > Thorsten-4 is built on 15+ years of psychology research that started long before ChatGPT, > 50+ trained psychologists interviewed 7,000+ people repeatedly over 4 years (from an 8-year-old to billionaires), > hand-tagged 35M+ words from those conversations, and checked the model’s predictions against what people actually did. It’s a Large Psychology Model that lets AI read the person behind the words, predicting their motives, decision style and likely reactions with 90% validated accuracy. AI agents now run sales calls, job interviews, and negotiations, but they miss the hesitation and pushback that decide how those conversations end, like the doubt behind a prospect’s “sounds great”. LLMs were built to read words, not people, and 10 leading AI models fall about 45% short of humans at tracking how a person’s thoughts and feelings change over time. They also cave easily, since leading AI models flip a correct answer 46% of the time when a user pushes back. Thorsten-4 reads the conversations companies already have (meetings, interviews, emails, chats and support calls) and scores each person on 50 behavioral and psychological traits, showing what drives them, how they decide and how they react under stress. Its training data can’t be scraped off the internet, because 50+ trained psychologists interviewed 7,000+ people again and again over 4 years and hand-tagged 35M+ words from those conversations. The team then checked the model’s predictions against established psychology tests and against what those people actually did over several years. Every read is explainable and traces back to the evidence behind it, and Thorsten-4 holds its read when a user pushes back. Companies plug it into the AI tools they already use, so their agents know when to push, when to pause and how to adapt. 🧵1/n https://t.co/pobxIhjhtP
在 X 查看这条帖子 ↗

来源:Rohan Paul · x.com

模型
发现内容有误?提交纠错